chaotic flavor eigenstates

happy birthday to dad. congratulations, you've finally reached the dreadful five zero and are now officially OLD. and yes, i definitely look better than you, dad.

have you ever met an old friend who annoyed you so much you started wondering whether you were high on crack or were just plain stupid when you first became acquainted with him?

well, i have, and it wasn't pleasant at all. it ruined my mood the day that i can't do work at all. whose fault was it? that little fucker, of course.

i thought writing humanities paper was bad, but it turned out writing scientific research paper was worse. i spent three hours at the library and five hours at starbucks, which, if my arithmetic serves me right, totals up to eight hours worth of staring at my powerbook, and this is all i've got:



that, and an acknowledgement section, of course. mike slackenerney was correct: when writing a scientific paper, always start with the acknowledgment.

why is it hard? well, let's see. it's partly because of the formatting, partly because of the content, but mostly because i have not the slightest idea on what the hell is going on. is it just me, or is it counterintuitive to produce a scientific paper when your experiment has shown NO significant result whatsoever?

i wanted to doodle tonight, but thanks to that idiot my mood is ruined.